Comparison of GoTo computerized telescope and manual Dobsonian telescope

GoTo vs Manual Telescopes

Choosing Between Computer-Assisted and Traditional Observing

Introduction: The Great Debate

The choice between GoTo computerized telescopes and traditional manual telescopes represents one of astronomy's most consequential equipment decisions, fundamentally shaping your observing experience, skill development, and budget requirements. This decision impacts not just which objects you observe, but HOW you engage with the night sky—whether you navigate celestial geography through personal knowledge and star-hopping skills, or leverage computer databases finding targets automatically.

GoTo telescopes incorporate motorized mounts with computer control, astronomical databases containing tens of thousands of objects, and alignment procedures syncing the mount's position with the sky. After alignment, simply select a target from the hand controller menu; the telescope automatically slews to that object, placing it in the eyepiece field. This automation dramatically increases observing efficiency, particularly for faint deep sky objects invisible to naked eye and difficult to locate manually. GoTo systems especially benefit astrophotographers requiring precise tracking, urban observers targeting specific objects amid light pollution, and those with limited time wanting maximum targets per session.

Manual telescopes—particularly Dobsonian reflectors but also manual equatorial mounts and simple Alt-Az systems—require the observer to point the telescope using knowledge, star charts, and navigation techniques. Finding targets demands understanding constellations, star patterns, and systematic search methods (star-hopping, setting circles, finder scopes). This hands-on approach teaches celestial geography, builds observing skills, and creates deeper connection with the sky. Manual systems also offer compelling practical advantages: dramatically lower cost (often 50-70% less than GoTo equivalents), zero setup time (no alignment procedures), no battery or power requirements, and mechanical simplicity eliminating electronic troubleshooting.

This comprehensive guide examines every aspect of the GoTo versus manual decision: how each technology works, setup requirements, learning curves, cost comparisons (initial and ongoing), astrophotography capabilities, portability considerations, and decision frameworks matching telescope type to your observing goals, budget, and experience level. Whether you're buying your first telescope or considering adding to an existing collection, understanding these trade-offs ensures you invest in equipment that enhances rather than frustrates your astronomy journey.

GoTo Technology Explained: How It Works

GoTo (short for "Go To") technology combines precision motorized mounts, onboard computers, astronomical databases, and alignment procedures to automatically point telescopes at celestial objects. Understanding how these systems work helps set realistic expectations and troubleshoot when issues arise.

Components of GoTo Systems

Motorized Mount: Stepper motors on both mount axes (altitude/azimuth for Alt-Az mounts; right ascension/declination for equatorial mounts) provide precise positioning under computer control. These motors move the telescope smoothly to targets and maintain tracking as Earth rotates. Quality motors ensure smooth slewing (movement to targets), accurate positioning (typically 5-15 arcminute accuracy), and minimal vibration during operation.

Hand Controller: LCD display with keypad serving as user interface. Modern controllers include: databases of 30,000-40,000+ objects (Messier, NGC, IC catalogs, named stars, planets), tonight's best targets filtered by visibility, tours of seasonal highlights, custom user coordinates, and alignment wizards guiding setup. Advanced controllers add: GPS receivers for automatic location/time, electronic compass for orientation sensing, WiFi connectivity for smartphone apps, and USB ports for firmware updates.

Encoders: Sensors on each axis tracking mount position. High-resolution encoders (typically 4,000-10,000 steps per revolution) allow the computer to know precisely where the telescope points. When you manually move the mount (if supported), encoders update the computer's position awareness, maintaining alignment despite manual intervention. Budget GoTo systems may lack encoders, losing position knowledge if manually moved after alignment.

Power System: GoTo mounts require 12V DC power, typically 1-2 amps consumption (12-24 watts). Power options include: rechargeable 12V lead-acid or lithium batteries, disposable alkaline battery packs (8x AA common), AC-to-12V adapters for home use, or power banks with 12V outputs. Battery life varies—typical 7Ah battery powers mount for 6-8 hours; heavier use or cold weather reduces runtime.

Alignment Procedures

GoTo systems must align (sync computer position with sky) before accurate pointing. Alignment teaches the computer where it's located on Earth, which direction it's pointing, and how the sky currently appears. Common alignment methods:

1-Star Alignment: Simplest but least accurate method. Telescope automatically points at bright star (Vega, Sirius, etc.). You center the star using directional buttons, confirming alignment. Computer now knows its orientation roughly. Accuracy: 1-2 degrees typically, sufficient for low-power eyepiece fields but not high magnification. Use for quick casual observing when precision unnecessary.

2-Star Alignment: Standard method balancing ease and accuracy. Computer selects two bright alignment stars in different sky regions (e.g., Vega in northeast, Fomalhaut in south). You center each star precisely. Computer triangulates telescope position and orientation from this data. Accuracy: 5-15 arcminutes typical, placing most objects within eyepiece field. Requires 5-10 minutes including star identification and centering. Best for visual observing and casual use.

3-Star Alignment: Enhanced precision using three alignment stars. Takes slightly longer (8-12 minutes) but improves accuracy to 2-5 arcminutes, especially important for high magnification planetary observing or astrophotography. Choose alignment stars spread across sky (one east, one west, one north/south) for best results.

Solar System Align: Uses bright planets or Moon rather than stars. Convenient when planets visible but fewer stars (twilight, urban skies, moonlight). Accuracy comparable to star alignment. Requires identifying planets visually before initiating alignment.

GPS Alignment: Mounts with GPS modules automatically determine location, time, date, and orientation (via electronic compass). This eliminates manual data entry, speeds alignment, and improves accuracy. Premium feature on mid-to-high-end mounts ($800+).

Popular GoTo Systems

Celestron NexStar+: Celestron's hand controller powering NexStar SE series, Evolution series, and other mounts. Database: 40,000+ objects. Features: SkyAlign (automatic alignment star selection), Tour mode, GPS on premium models. User-friendly interface, reliable performance. Widely supported by third-party accessories and software.

SkyWatcher SynScan: SkyWatcher's controller for AZ-GTi, Star Adventurer, EQ mounts. Database: 42,000+ objects. Features: WiFi connectivity (control via smartphone), good tracking accuracy, firmware updates via USB. More technical interface than Celestron but powerful features. Excellent value on mid-range mounts.

Meade AutoStar / AudioStar: Meade's hand controllers for LX and ETX series. Database: 30,000+ objects, AudioStar adds voice descriptions. Features: Guided tours, Astronomer Inside audio, intuitive menus. Quality tracking and alignment. Less popular than Celestron/SkyWatcher currently but older Meade scopes still excellent performers.

Orion StarSeeker: Orion's GoTo controller for StarSeeker series and SkyView Pro mounts. Database: 42,000+ objects. Features: simplified operation for beginners, good alignment wizard. Generally good value but less refined than premium systems. Suitable for casual users prioritizing ease over advanced features.

Manual Telescope Systems: Pure Mechanical

Manual telescopes rely entirely on human control—no motors, computers, or databases. The observer moves the telescope by hand, locates objects through knowledge and technique, and tracks manually by gently nudging the mount as Earth rotates. This hands-on approach offers simplicity, reliability, and profound satisfaction from personal achievement.

Types of Manual Mounts

Dobsonian Alt-Azimuth: The quintessential manual telescope mount, Dobsonians move on altitude (up/down) and azimuth (left/right) axes. Construction: Teflon bearing pads on plywood or aluminum rockers provide ultra-smooth motion with perfect balance. Large Dobsonians (10-16 inch apertures) weighing 50-100 pounds move with fingertip pressure despite their mass. Dobsonians excel for visual deep sky observing, offering maximum aperture per dollar. A well-collimated 10-inch Dobsonian ($600-$800) delivers stunning views rivaling $3,000 GoTo SCTs. Limitations: not suitable for astrophotography (no tracking), can be bulky for transport. Best for: beginners learning the sky, aperture-priority observers, deep sky enthusiasts, budget-conscious astronomers.

Manual Equatorial Mounts: Equatorial mounts align one axis (polar axis) with Earth's rotational axis, allowing single-axis tracking matching celestial motion. Manual EQ mounts include: German Equatorial Mounts (GEMs) with counterweights and adjustable tripods, Fork mounts on wedges achieving equatorial orientation, and barn-door trackers for wide-field imaging. Without motors, you manually follow objects using slow-motion controls (flexible cables or knobs adjusting position incrementally). Optional clock drives ($100-$150) add basic motorized RA tracking for long observing sessions or short-exposure imaging. Manual EQ mounts teach celestial mechanics—you directly experience Earth's rotation and learn polar alignment skills valuable for astrophotography. Limitations: heavier than Alt-Az, more complex setup, require polar alignment. Best for: learning astrophotography basics, visual observers wanting tracking convenience, those planning future motor drive additions.

Simple Alt-Azimuth Mounts: Basic Alt-Az mounts on tripods without Dobsonian's smooth altitude bearing. Includes pan-head camera mounts, fork mounts, and yoke mounts. These range from crude (friction-based movement requiring force) to refined (ball-bearing motion). Used on: small refractors (60mm-80mm), tabletop telescopes, grab-and-go scopes. Advantages: lightweight, portable, quick setup. Limitations: rough movement quality, unstable with larger instruments, no tracking. Best for: ultra-portable systems, wide-field scanning, lunar/planetary observation where tracking less critical.

Finding Objects Manually: Navigation Techniques

Manual telescope users develop object-location skills using these proven techniques:

Star-Hopping: Navigate from known bright stars to target using pattern recognition and angular distances. Example: Finding the Andromeda Galaxy—locate the Great Square of Pegasus, move to Alpheratz (northeast corner), hop to bright stars in Andromeda, sweep northward approximately 15 degrees to M31. Master star-hoppers mentally subdivide constellations, estimate angular distances using hand at arm's length (fist ≈ 10 degrees, three fingers ≈ 5 degrees), and use low-power finder scopes (8x50, red dot finders) for wide-field navigation. Star-hopping requires: constellation knowledge, star charts or apps showing hop paths, finder scope aligned accurately, and patience initially. Rewards: intimate sky knowledge, independence from technology, satisfying achievement.

Setting Circles: Graduated dials on mount axes indicating celestial coordinates (Right Ascension and Declination for EQ mounts; Altitude and Azimuth for Alt-Az). To use: align circles on known star, read target coordinates from atlas, move telescope to those coordinates. Accuracy depends on: careful alignment, precise coordinate reading, minimal mechanical backlash, and polar alignment quality (EQ mounts). Modern equivalent: digital setting circles (DSCs) displaying coordinates electronically, often interfacing with planetarium apps. Setting circles work well for faint objects requiring precise coordinates but demand more setup than star-hopping. Some observers love methodical precision; others find them tedious.

Finder Scopes and Charts: Wide-field optical finders (8x50, 9x50) or reflex finders (red dot sights) provide targeting assistance. Optical finders show 5-7 degree fields with magnification, revealing faint stars invisible to naked eye—essential for star-hopping. Red dot finders project illuminated dot or reticle on glass window, excellent for quick bright object location but useless for faint targets. Technique: use planispheres or star charts identifying target position relative to constellations, aim finder at target region, sweep with finder until target appears in finder field, center target, switch to main scope. Finder alignment critical—spend time collimating finder with main scope in daylight for frustration-free nighttime use.

The Learning Curve: Manual object location initially challenges beginners—expect 5-20 minutes finding your first Messier object, with occasional failures. However, skills develop rapidly. After locating 20-30 targets, common objects (Orion Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy, Pleiades) become nearly instant finds. After a season's experience, most observers locate objects faster manually than GoTo systems slew (which require alignment time). The learning process itself proves rewarding—each successful find builds confidence and knowledge. Many observers report manual telescopes enhanced their astronomy knowledge more than years of GoTo use because manual operation forced active engagement rather than passive computer reliance.

Setup and Alignment Time Comparison

Setup time profoundly affects observing frequency and satisfaction—telescopes requiring 30+ minutes setup often stay in storage, while systems ready in 5 minutes get used regularly. Consider setup time in context of typical observing sessions and your schedule constraints.

Manual Telescope Setup

Dobsonian Setup (3-5 minutes): (1) Carry tube and base separately to observing site—1-2 minutes. (2) Place base on level ground; set tube in rocker box saddle—30 seconds. (3) Install finder scope and eyepieces—1 minute. (4) Verify finder alignment on distant terrestrial object; adjust if needed—1-2 minutes. (5) Begin observing. Total: 3-5 minutes from storage to first view. No alignment procedures, no batteries, no technology. Largest Dobsonians (12-16 inch) with truss-tube designs require assembly but still complete in 8-10 minutes with practice. Tabletop Dobsonians (5-6 inch): under 2 minutes including tripod setup.

Manual EQ Mount Setup (5-10 minutes): (1) Extend and level tripod legs—2 minutes. (2) Attach mount head and counterweight bar—1 minute. (3) Mount optical tube assembly; balance with counterweights—2 minutes. (4) Rough polar alignment using Polaris (Northern Hemisphere) or Southern Cross (Southern Hemisphere)—2-3 minutes. (5) Install finder and eyepieces—1 minute. (6) Begin observing. Total: 5-10 minutes. For casual visual use, rough polar alignment suffices. Serious users performing precise polar alignment add 10-15 minutes using drift alignment methods.

GoTo Telescope Setup

GoTo Alt-Az Setup (12-20 minutes): (1) Extend and level tripod—importance of level surface cannot be overstated; use bubble level—3 minutes. (2) Attach fork mount or Alt-Az base; connect optical tube—2 minutes. (3) Connect hand controller and power supply (battery or AC adapter)—1 minute. (4) Power on; enter location (latitude/longitude), time zone, date/time (GPS models skip this, saving 2-3 minutes)—2-3 minutes. (5) Perform 2-star or 3-star alignment: hand controller suggests alignment stars, you center each star precisely—5-8 minutes depending on star visibility and centering accuracy. (6) Begin GoTo operation. Total: 12-20 minutes typical. Experienced users in familiar locations streamline to 10-12 minutes; beginners often need 20-25 minutes troubleshooting alignment issues.

GoTo EQ Mount Setup (15-30 minutes): (1) Extend and level tripod—3 minutes. (2) Attach equatorial mount head; install counterweight bar—2 minutes. (3) Mount optical tube; balance in both axes—3 minutes. (4) Perform polar alignment: rough polar alignment using Polaris/Southern Cross (3-5 minutes), or precise polar alignment using drift method or polar scope (10-15 minutes for astrophotography). (5) Connect electronics (hand controller, power)—1 minute. (6) Enter location/time/date—2-3 minutes (GPS models auto). (7) Perform 2-star or 3-star alignment—5-8 minutes. (8) Begin GoTo operation. Total: 15-30 minutes depending on polar alignment precision required. Visual observers using rough polar alignment: 15-18 minutes. Astrophotographers performing precise polar alignment: 25-35 minutes including alignment verification.

Practical Setup Considerations

Observing Session Length: For 2-3 hour observing sessions (typical backyard astronomy), 15-minute setup represents 8-12% of session time—modest overhead. For quick 30-45 minute sessions (spontaneous observing, brief clear periods), 15-minute setup consumes 30-50% of session—significant deterrent. Manual telescopes excel for short spontaneous sessions; GoTo makes sense for planned multi-hour sessions or when maximizing targets per session justifies setup time.

Permanent Installation: Telescopes permanently mounted in backyards or observatories eliminate setup entirely. GoTo systems with permanent installations become incredibly convenient—uncover telescope, power on, align (or load previous alignment), observe. No tripod setup, no optical tube mounting, no polar alignment. This transforms GoTo from 15-20 minute setup to 3-5 minute alignment. Permanent manual installations offer similar advantages but remain faster (uncover and observe, zero alignment). Consider permanent installation if you have: secure outdoor space, weather protection (dome, shed, roll-off roof), and commitment to regular observing.

Learning Curve Impact on Setup Time: First-time GoTo setup often takes 30-45 minutes as users learn alignment procedures, identify alignment stars, and troubleshoot. After 5-10 sessions, setup streamlines to 15-20 minutes. After a season's use, experienced users complete setup in 10-12 minutes efficiently. Manual telescopes show less learning curve variation—first setup might take 5-7 minutes learning assembly; experienced users complete in 3-4 minutes. Bottom line: GoTo setup time decreases with experience but never matches manual simplicity.

Learning Curve Comparison: Skills and Knowledge

The path to competent telescope operation differs dramatically between GoTo and manual systems, shaping not just your equipment proficiency but your broader astronomical knowledge and troubleshooting abilities.

Manual Telescope Learning Path

Initial Phase (Sessions 1-5): Learn constellation recognition using planispheres and star charts. Master bright star identification (Polaris, Vega, Arcturus, Sirius, Rigel). Practice finder scope alignment procedures. Attempt locating bright Messier objects (M31, M42, M13, M27). Expect frustration—you'll spend significant time searching, occasionally failing to find targets. Success rate: 50-70% for bright objects. Time investment: 5-10 hours total, mostly spent observing (not setup).

Development Phase (Sessions 6-20): Constellation knowledge solidifies—you recognize patterns automatically. Learn star-hopping techniques for common targets. Memorize key star patterns serving as navigation anchors (Summer Triangle, Winter Hexagon, Great Square). Develop systematic search strategies for different object types. Success rate improves: 70-90% for Messier objects, 50-70% for NGC targets. Time investment: 20-30 hours observing, building genuine astronomical knowledge alongside equipment skills.

Competency Phase (Sessions 21+): Navigate sky confidently; locate familiar objects in minutes. Tackle challenging faint targets using setting circles or precise star-hopping. Teach others constellation recognition and object location. The sky becomes a familiar landscape you navigate intuitively rather than through conscious effort. Success rate: >90% for cataloged objects visible in your aperture and sky conditions. At this stage, manual observing becomes faster than GoTo for familiar targets—you know exactly where to point without alignment overhead.

Knowledge Gained: Constellation patterns and mythology. Celestial coordinate system understanding. Seasonal sky changes and ecliptic path. Star colors, brightness, and spectral classification. Object types (galaxies, nebulae, clusters) and their characteristics. Atmospheric effects on observing. These skills transfer to any telescope and deepen your overall astronomical expertise. Many professional and serious amateur astronomers credit manual observing during their learning years as foundational to their sky knowledge.

GoTo Telescope Learning Path

Initial Phase (Sessions 1-5): Learn hand controller menu navigation and database organization. Master alignment procedures (star selection, centering technique). Troubleshoot common alignment failures (level surface, accurate time/location, proper star centering). Learn power management (battery connection, charge monitoring). Expect technical frustrations—alignment failures, battery issues, hand controller confusion. Success rate: 60-80% alignment success; when aligned properly, >95% object location success. Time investment: 5-10 hours learning equipment operation more than sky knowledge.

Development Phase (Sessions 6-20): Alignment becomes routine; complete confidently in 5-8 minutes. Learn optimal alignment star selection for your location/season. Develop troubleshooting skills (diagnosing alignment problems, correcting slewing errors). Explore database systematically (Messier catalog, seasonal tours). Success rate: >90% alignment success; reliable object location once aligned. Time investment: 20-30 hours primarily on equipment operation; sky knowledge develops passively while observing GoTo targets.

Competency Phase (Sessions 21+): GoTo operation becomes second nature; setup and alignment automatic. Maximize targets per session using efficient observing plans. Troubleshoot issues quickly (re-aligning if needed, adjusting tracking rates). Teaching others GoTo operation becomes possible. At this stage, GoTo enables rapid-fire observing—10-15 targets per hour vs. 3-5 targets manually. However, sky navigation skills remain undeveloped compared to manual users.

Knowledge Gained: Equipment operation expertise. Celestial coordinate system (theoretical). Database navigation. Alignment star identification (limited set of bright stars). Object names and catalog numbers. Less developed: constellation recognition away from alignment stars, star-hopping ability, naked-eye sky familiarity. GoTo users can observe many objects but may struggle identifying what they're looking at without computer assistance.

The Knowledge Gap

Studies of amateur astronomers reveal stark differences: manual telescope users typically learn constellations 2-3× faster, develop intuitive understanding of celestial mechanics earlier, and can operate any telescope type confidently. GoTo users become highly proficient with their specific equipment but struggle when using manual systems or when technology fails. This creates dependency—GoTo users often feel lost without computer assistance, whereas manual users view GoTo as convenient enhancement rather than necessity. The gap matters less for casual observers focused on viewing objects regardless of method, but significantly impacts those pursuing deeper astronomical knowledge or considering long-term hobby commitment.

Comprehensive Cost Analysis: Initial and Ongoing

GoTo and manual telescopes differ dramatically in cost, both at purchase and throughout ownership. Understanding total cost of ownership helps budget realistically and avoid buyer's remorse.

Initial Purchase Cost Comparison

Entry-Level ($400-$600):

  • Manual: 6-8 inch Dobsonian ($400-$500), excellent optical quality, includes basic eyepieces and finder. Ready to observe, no additional requirements. Examples: Apertura AD8, Sky-Watcher Classic 200P Dobsonian, Orion SkyQuest XT8.
  • GoTo: 4-5 inch SCT with basic GoTo ($500-$650), smaller aperture than manual equivalent, includes hand controller and motors but entry-level tracking accuracy. Requires batteries ($40-$60 additional). Examples: Celestron NexStar 4SE, Meade ETX125 Observer.

Verdict: Manual offers 50-100% more aperture for the same budget. Manual 8-inch shows dramatically more detail on deep sky objects than GoTo 4-inch despite computerization.

Mid-Range ($800-$1,500):

  • Manual: 10-12 inch Dobsonian ($800-$1,200), premium features like dual-speed focusers, better finder scopes, cooling fans. Massive light-gathering ability. Examples: Apertura AD10/AD12, Sky-Watcher Flextube 300P, Orion SkyQuest XX12i (includes push-to).
  • GoTo: 6-8 inch SCT with mid-level GoTo ($1,000-$1,500), good optics and tracking, solid hand controller, GPS on some models. Batteries required. Examples: Celestron NexStar 6SE/8SE, Meade LX85 8", Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P.

Verdict: Manual 10-12 inch delivers professional-grade deep sky views. GoTo 6-8 inch offers convenience and better planetary/astrophotography capability but less aperture. Choice depends on priorities: aperture or automation.

Premium ($2,000-$5,000+):

  • Manual: 14-18 inch premium Dobsonians ($2,500-$4,500), truss-tube designs for portability, servo-assisted motion, telrad finders, premium focusers. Ultimate deep sky performance. Examples: Explore Scientific truss Dobsonians, Obsession Classic, Apertura AD15.
  • GoTo: 8-11 inch SCT on advanced mount ($2,000-$4,000), or dedicated astrophotography EQ mounts ($1,500-$3,500) plus OTA. GPS, WiFi, high-precision tracking, autoguiding ports. Examples: Celestron EdgeHD 9.25" on CGEM II, Meade LX200 10", Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro mount.

Verdict: Both deliver exceptional performance. Manual Dobsonians dominate visual deep sky; GoTo systems enable serious astrophotography. At this price point, many enthusiasts own both.

Ongoing Costs (10-Year Ownership)

Manual Telescope Costs:

  • Maintenance supplies (lubricant, cleaning materials): $50-$100
  • Replacement eyepieces (upgrades over time): $200-$400
  • Finder scope upgrades: $50-$100
  • Occasional repairs (focuser rebuild, mirror recoating): $100-$200
  • Total 10-year cost: Purchase price + $400-$800

GoTo Telescope Costs:

  • Batteries and power supplies: $200-$400 (replacements every 3-5 years, chargers, cables)
  • Electronics repairs (hand controller, motor drivers): $100-$300 (assuming 1-2 component failures over 10 years)
  • Firmware updates and cables: $30-$60
  • Maintenance supplies: $50-$100
  • Replacement eyepieces: $200-$400
  • Total 10-year cost: Purchase price + $580-$1,260

Hidden Costs: GoTo systems may require: AC power extensions for backyard use ($30-$60), dew heaters for SCT corrector plates ($60-$100), additional batteries for redundancy ($40-$80), hand controller replacement if damaged ($100-$200). Manual systems may add: digital setting circles ($200-$300 optional), upgraded finder scopes ($80-$150), accessory tables ($50-$100). Neither cost is mandatory but common as users optimize their setups.

Aperture Per Dollar Analysis

The most objective cost comparison: aperture per dollar spent. Manual telescopes deliver roughly 2-3× more aperture for equivalent investment. Examples at $1,000 budget: Manual 10-inch Dobsonian (250mm) vs. GoTo 6-inch SCT (150mm). The 10-inch gathers 2.78× more light, resolving finer detail and showing fainter objects. For pure visual observing, manual systems dominate cost-effectiveness. GoTo justifies higher cost through conveniences: rapid object location, tracking for high-magnification viewing, astrophotography capability, and appeal to technology enthusiasts who value automation.

Astrophotography Considerations: When GoTo Becomes Essential

Astrophotography represents the one application where GoTo technology transitions from convenience to necessity. Long-exposure imaging of deep sky objects requires precise tracking compensating for Earth's rotation, and GoTo mounts provide the tracking accuracy and automation essential for successful astrophotography.

Imaging Requirements

Lunar and Planetary Imaging: Moon and planets require very short exposures (1/100 to 1/10 second) due to their brightness. At these exposure times, Earth's rotation doesn't cause visible star trailing. Result: you can photograph Moon and planets with ANY telescope type, including manual Alt-Az Dobsonians. Technique: use planetary cameras (ZWO ASI, Celestron NexImage) or webcams capturing thousands of short frames. Software stacks the best frames overcoming atmospheric turbulence. GoTo offers convenience (easy planet location, tracking keeps planet centered during capture) but isn't mandatory for lunar/planetary work.

Deep Sky Imaging: Galaxies, nebulae, and clusters are faint, requiring long exposures (30 seconds to 10+ minutes per frame). During exposure, stars must remain perfectly fixed on camera sensor—any movement creates trailing. Manual Alt-Az mounts cannot provide this tracking; only equatorial mounts tracking Earth's rotation keep stars stationary. Deep sky astrophotography demands: Equatorial mount with motorized tracking, GoTo for locating faint targets invisible in finder scopes, Autoguiding (secondary camera monitoring tracking errors and correcting in real-time), Polar alignment within arcminutes (precise alignment with celestial pole). Attempting deep sky imaging without these capabilities produces star trails instead of pinpoint stars.

Mount Requirements for Astrophotography

Visual-Only GoTo (Alt-Az): Suitable for: lunar imaging, planetary imaging, wide-field imaging <30 second exposures. NOT suitable for: deep sky imaging requiring minutes-long exposures. Examples: Celestron NexStar SE series, Sky-Watcher Virtuoso. Cost: $600-$1,500.

Basic GoTo EQ Mounts: Suitable for: wide-field imaging up to 200mm focal length, unguided exposures 30-60 seconds, planetary imaging, lunar mosaics. Require: precise polar alignment, careful balancing, sturdy tripod. Examples: Celestron Advanced VX, Sky-Watcher EQ5, Orion Sirius EQ-G. Cost: $800-$1,200 mount only.

Advanced Imaging Mounts: Suitable for: serious deep sky astrophotography, guided exposures up to 10+ minutes, heavy optical tube assemblies, professional-grade results. Features: superior tracking accuracy (±5 arcsecond periodic error), built-in autoguiding ports, robust construction supporting 15-40 pound payloads, GPS and polar alignment scopes. Examples: Celestron CGEM II, Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro, iOptron CEM40. Cost: $1,500-$3,500.

Premium Astrophotography Mounts: Professional-grade systems with exceptional tracking, heavy payload capacity (40-80 pounds), absolute encoders, advanced control systems. Examples: Paramount MX+, 10Micron GM2000, Astro-Physics Mach1GTO. Cost: $8,000-$15,000+. For serious astrophotographers producing publication-quality images.

Can You Do Astrophotography with Manual Equipment?

Extremely limited options exist for manual telescope astrophotography: Manual EQ mounts with basic clock drives ($100-$150 add-on motors providing RA axis tracking) enable wide-field imaging (50-135mm camera lenses) with unguided exposures up to 60 seconds. Results: suitable for Milky Way landscapes, constellation portraits, wide nebulae fields. Barn-door trackers (DIY or commercial $80-$150) provide basic tracking for camera+lens astrophotography. Results: similar to basic clock drives—wide-field only, limited exposure times. Stationary tripod photography limited to very wide focal lengths (<35mm) and short exposures (<20 seconds) showing Milky Way but not detailed nebulae or galaxies. Bottom line: serious deep sky astrophotography requires GoTo EQ mount. Manual systems relegated to wide-field imaging and lunar/planetary work. If astrophotography is your primary goal, budget for proper GoTo EQ mount from the start rather than wasting money on inadequate equipment.

Push-To Systems: The Middle Ground

Push-to systems occupy the sweet spot between fully manual and GoTo telescopes, combining manual telescope advantages (simplicity, low cost, mechanical reliability) with computer-assisted object location eliminating tedious star-hopping. For many observers, push-to represents the ideal compromise.

How Push-To Works

Push-to systems use digital encoders on mount axes tracking telescope position. As you manually move the telescope, encoders detect motion and update displayed celestial coordinates. A handheld computer or smartphone app shows: current telescope position, target object position, directional arrows guiding you toward target, and distance to target. You physically push the telescope following directional cues; when arrows converge and distance reaches zero, target appears in eyepiece. No motors, no slewing, no complex alignment—just intelligent guidance for manual pointing.

Advantages Over GoTo

Lower Cost: Push-to systems cost $200-$400 as add-ons to existing telescopes, versus $600-$2,000 premium for full GoTo. Complete push-to Dobsonians (encoders included) cost only $100-$200 more than non-computerized equivalents.

Simpler Setup: Push-to alignment requires 2-star alignment similar to GoTo but no motors to balance, no battery power consumption (many systems use coin cells lasting months), and faster alignment since you manually point at alignment stars rather than waiting for slow slewing.

No Power Requirements: Most push-to systems use low-power handheld computers running on AA or AAA batteries, or smartphone apps using phone battery. No need for 12V power supplies, heavy batteries, or AC power.

Encourages Sky Learning: Manually pushing telescope keeps you engaged with the sky's geography. You see the path from current position to target, learning star patterns and spatial relationships. GoTo users often ignore surrounding sky, missing this educational benefit.

Mechanical Simplicity: No motors to fail, no complex electronics, no firmware updates. Encoders are simple devices rarely malfunctioning. Most push-to systems more reliable than GoTo over long-term ownership.

Popular Push-To Systems

Orion IntelliScope: Orion's push-to system included on SkyQuest XX and XT-i series Dobsonians. Handheld computer with 14,000+ object database. Simple two-star alignment. Directional LEDs and audio tones guide you to targets. Cost: $100-$150 as option on compatible Dobsonians. Works well for casual use; database smaller than premium systems.

JMI NGC Max: Standalone digital setting circles retrofittable to almost any telescope. Database: 400+ named objects, entire NGC/IC catalog accessible by number. Small LCD display showing coordinates and target info. Requires: encoder installation on your mount axes (DIY project or professional installation). Cost: $300-$400 plus encoders ($100-$150). Excellent for experienced observers who know catalog numbers.

Astronomy Sky Hound: Software-based push-to using smartphone/tablet with Bluetooth encoders. Requires: Sky Hound app ($30), compatible encoder system ($200-$300), smartphone/tablet with Bluetooth. Advantages: visual star charts showing telescope position, huge databases, intuitive graphical interface, regular updates. Works on Android or iOS. Popular with tech-savvy observers wanting smartphone integration.

Encoder Systems for DIY Push-To: Several companies sell encoder pairs with Bluetooth modules for DIY installation: Ouranos, Orion, DSC01. Pair these with free planetarium apps (SkySafari Plus/Pro, Stellarium Mobile) for full push-to functionality. Cost: $200-$350 for encoders. Installation straightforward on most Dobsonians and GEM mounts. Result: professional-grade push-to at fraction of commercial system cost. Ideal for hobbyists comfortable with basic assembly.

Limitations Compared to GoTo

Push-to cannot: Automatically slew to objects (you manually push), Track objects as Earth rotates (requires manual tracking), Work for astrophotography (no motorized tracking), or Offer tours (you choose targets manually). Despite limitations, many observers prefer push-to's hands-on character combined with computer assistance for unfamiliar objects. The best of both worlds for visual observing.

Portability and Power Requirements

Transport and power logistics significantly impact observing frequency and site selection. Telescopes requiring complex transport or heavy power systems often stay home, while highly portable systems enable opportunistic dark-sky trips.

Weight and Transport

Dobsonians: Modest-sized Dobsonians (6-8 inch) weigh 25-40 pounds total, splitting into tube (15-25 lbs) and base (10-15 lbs)—manageable for most people in two trips to car. Larger Dobsonians (10-12 inch) weigh 50-75 pounds but still split into manageable pieces. Truss-tube Dobsonians (12-18 inch) disassemble into compact components fitting in car trunks—engineering marvel enabling 16-inch apertures in portable packages. Downside: bulky even when disassembled; SUV or large sedan helpful for 12+ inch scopes.

GoTo Alt-Az Systems: SCTs on Alt-Az GoTo forks (like NexStar SE series) weight 20-50 pounds, but require tripod (15-25 lbs), power supply (5-15 lbs if using large battery), and accessories (10+ lbs). Total system weight: 50-90 pounds across multiple components. Transport complexity: tripod, mount, optical tube, counterweights, power supply, hand controller, eyepiece case. Requires 3-5 trips to car or rolling cart.

GoTo EQ Systems: Heaviest configurations—mount head (25-50 lbs), tripod (20-30 lbs), optical tube (15-40 lbs), counterweights (10-25 lbs), power (5-15 lbs). Total: 75-160 pounds depending on size. Serious transport challenge requiring vehicle with cargo space. Many observers invest in rolling carts or permanent observatory installations eliminating transport issues. Not suitable for frequent site changes or airline travel.

Grab-and-Go Systems: Small refractors (60-80mm) and compact Maksutov-Cassegrains (90-127mm) on simple Alt-Az mounts total <15 pounds including tripod. Single-trip carry, fits in car trunk or plane overhead bin, sets up in <5 minutes. Perfect for travel, spontaneous observing, or complementing larger primary scope. Manual preferred for ultra-portability; adding GoTo increases weight and complexity.

Power System Logistics

Manual Telescopes: Zero power requirements for Dobsonians and manual mounts. Completely self-sufficient observing—no batteries to charge, monitor, or carry. Never shortened by power depletion. Ideal for remote dark-sky sites without electricity, backcountry camping, or disaster-readiness (astronomy during power outages!). Only exception: illuminated finder reticles (red dot finders) use coin cells lasting months/years.

GoTo Power Needs: Typical 12V DC, 1-2 amp draw (12-24 watts continuous). Power options ranked by portability:

  • Disposable Batteries: 8x AA holder powering mount for 4-8 hours. Lightest option (1 pound), but ongoing cost ($8-$15 per session) makes it expensive long-term. Emergency backup worth carrying.
  • Rechargeable Battery Packs: 7-12Ah lead-acid or lithium batteries. Lead-acid: heavy (8-15 lbs) but cheap ($40-$80). Lithium: light (2-4 lbs) but expensive ($80-$200). Runtime: 6-12 hours typical. Best general solution balancing cost, weight, runtime. Requires charging between sessions.
  • Power Stations: Jackery, Goal Zero, or similar portable power stations providing 12V, USB, and AC outputs. Advantage: power telescope, laptop, camera, dew heaters simultaneously. Disadvantage: expensive ($200-$800), heavy (10-30 lbs). Worthwhile for astrophotography setups needing multiple devices powered.
  • AC Power: AC-to-12V adapters work if observing near buildings with outlets. Zero ongoing cost, unlimited runtime, but ties you to electrical infrastructure.

Power Management: Monitor battery voltage (many mounts display battery level) to avoid unexpected shutdowns mid-session. Carry backup batteries for extended sessions or critical observations. Cold weather drastically reduces battery capacity (50% reduction at 0°F)—keep batteries insulated or close to body temperature before use. Disable tracking when not actively observing to conserve power.

Decision Guide: Choosing the Right System

Selecting between GoTo and manual telescopes depends on your specific circumstances, priorities, and observing goals. Use this decision framework evaluating your situation across multiple dimensions.

Choose Manual Telescopes If You:

  • Prioritize aperture and light-gathering power—manual Dobsonians deliver 2-3× more aperture per dollar than GoTo equivalents. Better deep sky views.
  • Want to learn the night sky thoroughly—manual observing forces constellation recognition, star patterns, and navigation skills. Superior astronomical education.
  • Value simplicity and reliability—no electronics to fail, batteries to charge, firmware to update. Mechanical systems last decades with minimal maintenance.
  • Prefer spontaneous quick-setup observing—3-5 minute setup enables impromptu sessions when skies clear unexpectedly. GoTo's 15-20 minute setup discourages spontaneity.
  • Observe from remote dark-sky sites—no power requirements, complete self-sufficiency, lighter transport weight (Dobsonians).
  • Have limited budget—manual telescopes cost 50-70% less than GoTo equivalents for similar optical quality.
  • Enjoy hands-on engagement—star-hopping and manual tracking keep you actively engaged with observing process rather than passive computer reliance.

Choose GoTo Telescopes If You:

  • Plan serious astrophotography—deep sky imaging absolutely requires tracking equatorial mount. GoTo eliminates manual pointing and tracking.
  • Observe from light-polluted urban/suburban sites—finding faint objects amid light pollution difficult manually; GoTo precisely targets coordinates.
  • Have limited observing time per session—GoTo maximizes targets per hour (10-15 objects) vs. manual (3-5 objects), valuable for busy schedules or short clear periods.
  • Prefer convenience over learning—GoTo eliminates star-hopping, chart reading, manual tracking. Easier operation after initial setup investment.
  • Observe high-magnification planetary details—GoTo tracking keeps planets centered at 200-400× magnification while you observe comfortably. Manual tracking tedious at extreme magnifications.
  • Want technology integration—enjoy smartphone apps, databases, WiFi control, and computer-assisted astronomy. GoTo appeals to tech enthusiasts.
  • Can tolerate higher cost and complexity—willing to pay 2-3× more, maintain batteries, troubleshoot electronics for automation benefits.

Hybrid Approaches (Best of Both Worlds)

Manual First, GoTo Later: Start with manual 6-8 inch Dobsonian ($400-$600) learning sky navigation and observing fundamentals. After 1-2 years, add GoTo system if desired ($800-$1,500). Now you own both: use manual for quick sessions and teaching sky knowledge; use GoTo for astrophotography, convenience, or challenging targets. Total investment: $1,200-$2,100 but spread over time. Benefits: complete skill set, equipment flexibility, no regrets from premature GoTo purchase before understanding needs.

Push-To Compromise: Buy push-to equipped Dobsonian (adds $100-$200 to base price) or retrofit encoders to existing manual scope ($200-$400). Gain computer-assisted object location without full GoTo complexity and cost. Maintains hands-on observing character while eliminating tedious star-hopping for unfamiliar objects. Ideal middle ground for visual observers wanting occasional electronic assistance.

Specialized Systems: Own manual telescope for visual deep sky (Dobsonian) AND GoTo system for astrophotography (EQ mount). Many serious amateurs use this approach—each tool optimized for its purpose. Manual 10-12 inch Dob for breathtaking visual observing ($800-$1,200); GoTo EQ mount with 80mm APO refractor for imaging ($2,000-$3,000). Total investment significant ($3,000-$4,500) but provides professional-grade capabilities for both observing modes.

Red Flags: When NOT to Buy GoTo

  • First telescope purchase with limited budget—spending $1,200 on GoTo 6-inch yields less satisfaction than $600 manual 10-inch for same observing goals. Save GoTo for second scope.
  • Unwilling to learn alignment procedures—GoTo requires 10-20 minute alignment per session. If this sounds tedious, you'll abandon GoTo frustrated. Buy manual.
  • Observing in very cold climates—electronics and batteries struggle below 20°F (-7°C). Manual systems work flawlessly regardless of temperature.
  • Young children (under 10) as primary users—children lack patience for alignment procedures and troubleshooting. Manual scopes better for kids: instant gratification, no fragile electronics, hands-on learning.
  • Remote observing sites without power—unless you're committed to carrying heavy batteries, GoTo impractical for backcountry astronomy. Manual scopes self-sufficient.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should beginners buy GoTo or manual telescopes?

Beginners benefit more from manual telescopes (especially Dobsonians) because they teach fundamental sky navigation skills, cost significantly less for equivalent aperture, require no setup time or alignment procedures, and eliminate technical troubleshooting that frustrates newcomers. A manual 8-inch Dobsonian costs $400-$500 and immediately shows spectacular views of Moon, planets, and bright deep sky objects. An equivalent 8-inch GoTo SCT costs $1,200-$1,500 and requires learning alignment procedures, understanding celestial coordinates, maintaining batteries, and troubleshooting electronics. Beginners often abandon astronomy after struggling with GoTo setup rather than observing. Manual scopes get you observing immediately while building knowledge of constellations, star patterns, and celestial navigation—skills that make you a better observer regardless of equipment. Once you master manual observing and understand the sky, adding GoTo convenience makes sense if your budget allows and observing style benefits from automation. Exception: if you have severe physical limitations preventing manual telescope movement, or live under extremely light-polluted skies requiring targeting specific deep sky objects whose locations you cannot identify, GoTo may be worthwhile despite the learning curve. For most beginners: start manual, upgrade to GoTo later if desired.

What is the difference between Alt-Az and Equatorial GoTo mounts?

Alt-Azimuth (Alt-Az) and Equatorial (EQ) GoTo mounts both computerized track objects but differ fundamentally in mechanical design and capabilities. Alt-Az mounts move in altitude (up/down) and azimuth (left/right)—simple, intuitive axes matching how you naturally point at objects. These work excellently for visual observing, offering lighter weight, simpler setup, and lower cost than equatorial mounts. However, Alt-Az tracking causes field rotation—as the mount tracks an object, the field slowly rotates around the eyepiece center. This doesn't affect visual observing but severely limits astrophotography to exposures under 30-60 seconds before stars trail. Popular Alt-Az GoTo systems: Celestron NexStar SE series, SkyWatcher Heritage virtuoso, Orion StarSeeker. Equatorial mounts align one axis (polar axis) with Earth's rotational axis, allowing single-axis tracking that matches celestial motion without field rotation. This enables long-exposure astrophotography (minutes to hours) once properly polar aligned. EQ mounts are heavier, more expensive, and require polar alignment procedures (aligning polar axis with celestial pole within arcminutes). They're essential for serious astrophotography but overkill for visual-only observers. Popular EQ GoTo mounts: Celestron Advanced VX, SkyWatcher EQ6-R, iOptron CEM25P. Summary: Alt-Az GoTo perfect for visual observing and casual imaging (Moon, planets); EQ GoTo necessary for deep sky astrophotography requiring exposures >1 minute. For visual observing only, Alt-Az offers better value, portability, and ease of use.

How accurate is GoTo pointing and does it always find objects?

GoTo pointing accuracy depends critically on alignment quality—proper alignment typically achieves 5-15 arcminute accuracy (objects land within eyepiece field), while poor alignment may miss by degrees. After careful 2-star or 3-star alignment on a level surface with accurate time/location data, GoTo systems reliably place objects within a low-power eyepiece field (30-45 arcminute field). You may need to center objects manually, especially at high magnification, but GoTo gets you close enough to identify targets. Factors affecting accuracy: alignment star selection (choosing bright, well-separated alignment stars improves precision), mount levelness (bubble level critical), time and location accuracy (GPS-equipped mounts eliminate this variable), mechanical backlash (wear in gears causes slop), and atmospheric refraction near horizon. Modern GoTo databases contain 30,000-40,000+ objects including Messier catalog, NGC/IC catalogs, named stars, planets, and user-defined positions. The system will attempt to slew to any object in the database, but whether you can actually SEE the object depends on your aperture, sky conditions, and object brightness. GoTo won't make a faint magnitude 13 galaxy visible in a 4-inch scope under urban skies, but it will point accurately at the galaxy's coordinates. What GoTo cannot find: objects not in database (though you can add custom coordinates), objects below horizon, or objects obscured by buildings/trees. It also cannot compensate for grossly incorrect alignment—garbage in, garbage out. Best practice: verify alignment accuracy by slewing to bright known objects (planets, bright stars) after initial alignment; if these appear centered, confidence high for subsequent targets. If first test slews miss significantly, redo alignment before attempting faint targets. Most GoTo frustration stems from poor alignment rather than mount inaccuracy.

Do GoTo telescopes still require learning the night sky?

GoTo telescopes dramatically reduce the NEED to learn constellations and star patterns for finding specific objects, but understanding the sky enhances even GoTo observing and proves essential when technology fails. With GoTo, you can observe the Andromeda Galaxy without knowing where Andromeda constellation lies, or find Saturn without recognizing it among stars. The computer does navigation, letting you focus on observing. However, relying purely on GoTo creates dependencies and limitations: you cannot operate if batteries die, hand controller malfunctions, or alignment fails; you miss the satisfaction and connection from manually hunting objects; you lack context about what you're observing (which constellation, nearby objects, seasonal visibility); and you develop no backup skills for non-GoTo equipment. Many experienced observers recommend learning manual sky navigation FIRST using planispheres, star charts, and star-hopping techniques, THEN adding GoTo convenience. This approach builds fundamental knowledge while avoiding GoTo's initial frustration. Alternatively, use GoTo to TEACH yourself the sky: after the mount slews to an object, step back and identify surrounding constellations, noting patterns and relationships. Use planetarium apps showing what the GoTo found and its celestial context. Over time, you'll internalize sky geography even while enjoying GoTo convenience. Think of it like GPS navigation: GPS gets you to destinations efficiently, but understanding maps and geography makes you more capable and resourceful. Similarly, GoTo gets you to celestial objects efficiently, but understanding the sky makes you a better, more versatile observer. The ideal approach combines both: use GoTo for efficiency while actively learning the sky, so you're never wholly dependent on technology but still enjoy its benefits.

What ongoing costs do GoTo telescopes have compared to manual?

GoTo telescopes incur ongoing costs absent from manual telescopes: batteries or power supplies, occasional electronics repairs, firmware updates requiring specific cables/software, and potentially hand controller replacements. Battery costs vary by system—typical GoTo mount draws 1-2 amps at 12V, consuming 12-24 watts. Using rechargeable 12V batteries: initial battery cost $40-$80 (7-12 Ah capacity), battery charger $20-$40, replacement batteries every 3-5 years ($40-$80). Heavy users might spend $20-$40 annually on power solutions. Alternatively, AC-powered systems using household current eliminate battery costs but restrict observing to locations with power access. Disposable alkaline batteries (8x AA typical) cost $8-$15 per set and last 4-8 hours; serious users quickly spend more than rechargeable solutions. Electronics repairs: hand controllers, motor drivers, and circuit boards can fail from moisture, cold, drops, or age. Hand controller replacement: $100-$200; motor replacement: $60-$120 per axis; circuit board repairs: $50-$150. Failure rates low (most mounts operate 5-10+ years without issues) but when failures occur, costs significant. Firmware updates (released occasionally by manufacturers fixing bugs or adding features) require specific serial cables ($20-$30) and compatible computers. Manual telescopes ongoing costs: essentially none beyond normal maintenance (lubricant, occasional eyepiece replacement). Manual Dobsonians particularly economical—no electronics to fail, no batteries to replace, no firmware to update. Over 10 years ownership: GoTo telescope total cost = purchase price + $200-$500 in batteries, power supplies, potential repairs. Manual telescope total cost = purchase price + $50-$100 in maintenance supplies. Budget-conscious observers favor manual; those valuing convenience accept GoTo's additional expenses. Consider also resale value: manual telescopes (especially premium Dobsonians) retain value well and remain desirable used. GoTo telescopes depreciate faster as technology ages and newer systems offer superior electronics—a 10-year-old GoTo hand controller feels ancient; a 10-year-old Dobsonian performs identically to new.

Can you do astrophotography with manual telescopes?

Yes, but with significant limitations depending on imaging goals. Manual Alt-Az mounts (Dobsonians, tabletop scopes) can photograph: bright targets with very short exposures—Moon (1/100 to 1/1000 sec), planets (1/60 to 1/10 sec), Sun with solar filters (1/1000 sec). These exposures short enough that Earth's rotation doesn't cause star trailing even without tracking. Techniques: smartphone through eyepiece (afocal imaging), webcam/planetary camera for lucky imaging (capture thousands of short frames, stack best), or DSLR at prime focus. Results: excellent lunar craters, planetary details (Jupiter bands, Saturn rings, Mars polar caps), solar prominences and sunspots. What manual Alt-Az mounts CANNOT do: deep sky astrophotography of faint galaxies, nebulae, clusters requiring exposures of 30 seconds to several minutes. Without tracking, stars trail noticeably in exposures >1-2 seconds depending on focal length. Manual Equatorial mounts offer better astrophotography potential: once polar aligned, the EQ mount's RA axis tracks celestial motion. Add a basic clock drive ($100-$150) or motor drive ($150-$300) for motorized tracking, enabling unguided exposures of 30-60 seconds and guided exposures (using autoguider computer correcting for tracking errors) of several minutes. This opens deep sky imaging with proper cameras and technique, though results won't match premium dedicated astrophotography mounts. For serious astrophotography: GoTo EQ mount essential, providing precise goto, tracking, and often built-in autoguiding ports. Summary: lunar/planetary imaging possible with any manual mount using short exposures; deep sky imaging requires EQ mount with tracking drive; serious astrophotography demands GoTo EQ mount with autoguiding. If astrophotography is primary goal, invest in appropriate mount from the start rather than attempting workarounds with manual Alt-Az systems.